Part of the data ring
BurnLab
Head to head · same equation, both sides

Badminton vs Tennis

Which burns more calories, and by how much — from the same Compendium MET data.

Badminton

515
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 7
Burns more
vs

Tennis

470
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 6.4

Badminton burns more — about 515 kcal an hour versus 470 kcal for tennis, for a 70 kg adult. That is 9% more, or 44 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 7 for badminton against 6.4 for tennis.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

  1. Take the activity's MET value from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities — the measured ratio of its energy cost to sitting quietly.
  2. Convert MET to a rate using the ACSM relationship: multiply by 3.5, then by body mass in kilograms, then divide by 200. That gives kilocalories per minute.
  3. Multiply the rate by the number of minutes actually spent.
  4. Round to whole kilocalories. Nothing else is applied — no age factor, no sex factor, no proprietary adjustment, because the underlying data does not support one.
kcal/min = MET × 3.5 × mass(kg) ÷ 200
kcal     = kcal/min × minutes

Full data and method →

Side by side, by body weight and duration

Badminton against tennis at MET 7 and MET 6.4, by body weight. JUL 2026
Body weightBadminton · 30 minTennis · 30 minBadminton · 1 hrTennis · 1 hr
50 kg 184168 368336
60 kg 221202 441403
70 kg 257235 515470
80 kg 294269 588538
90 kg 331302 662605
100 kg 368336 735672
110 kg 404370 809739
120 kg 441403 882806

Both columns use the same equation and the same reference data, so the comparison is like-for-like.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How to read this

A higher MET means a higher energy cost per minute — but the activity you will actually keep doing beats the one that scores better on paper. Badminton wins on rate; if tennis is the one you enjoy, the extra 9% is easily recovered by doing 6 more minutes.

Both figures assume a 70 kg adult and steady effort for the full hour, which is a generous assumption for anything vigorous. Realistic sessions include rest.

Questions

Does badminton or tennis burn more calories?

Badminton burns more — about 515 kcal an hour versus 470 kcal for tennis, for a 70 kg adult. That is 9% more, or 44 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 7 for badminton against 6.4 for tennis.

Both numbers are models. Neither knows your gradient, your gear, or how hard you were actually trying.

MET values from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities. General information only — not medical, fitness or nutrition advice. Calorie figures are population estimates and vary between individuals.

See all 10 sites in this family, with what each one answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.