Part of the data ring
BurnLab
Head to head · same equation, both sides

Climbing hills vs Walking

Which burns more calories, and by how much — from the same Compendium MET data.

Climbing hills

588
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 8
Burns more
vs

Walking

294
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 4

Climbing hills burns more — about 588 kcal an hour versus 294 kcal for walking, for a 70 kg adult. That is 100% more, or 294 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 8 for climbing hills against 4 for walking.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

  1. Take the activity's MET value from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities — the measured ratio of its energy cost to sitting quietly.
  2. Convert MET to a rate using the ACSM relationship: multiply by 3.5, then by body mass in kilograms, then divide by 200. That gives kilocalories per minute.
  3. Multiply the rate by the number of minutes actually spent.
  4. Round to whole kilocalories. Nothing else is applied — no age factor, no sex factor, no proprietary adjustment, because the underlying data does not support one.
kcal/min = MET × 3.5 × mass(kg) ÷ 200
kcal     = kcal/min × minutes

Full data and method →

Side by side, by body weight and duration

Climbing hills against walking at MET 8 and MET 4, by body weight. JUL 2026
Body weightClimbing hills · 30 minWalking · 30 minClimbing hills · 1 hrWalking · 1 hr
50 kg 210105 420210
60 kg 252126 504252
70 kg 294147 588294
80 kg 336168 672336
90 kg 378189 756378
100 kg 420210 840420
110 kg 462231 924462
120 kg 504252 1,008504

Both columns use the same equation and the same reference data, so the comparison is like-for-like.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How to read this

A higher MET means a higher energy cost per minute — but the activity you will actually keep doing beats the one that scores better on paper. Climbing hills wins on rate; if walking is the one you enjoy, the extra 100% is easily recovered by doing 60 more minutes.

Both figures assume a 70 kg adult and steady effort for the full hour, which is a generous assumption for anything vigorous. Realistic sessions include rest.

Questions

Does climbing hills or walking burn more calories?

Climbing hills burns more — about 588 kcal an hour versus 294 kcal for walking, for a 70 kg adult. That is 100% more, or 294 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 8 for climbing hills against 4 for walking.

Both numbers are models. Neither knows your gradient, your gear, or how hard you were actually trying.

MET values from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities. General information only — not medical, fitness or nutrition advice. Calorie figures are population estimates and vary between individuals.

See all 10 sites in this family, with what each one answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.