Part of the data ring
BurnLab
Head to head · same equation, both sides

Horseback riding vs Walking

Which burns more calories, and by how much — from the same Compendium MET data.

Horseback riding

415
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 5.65
Burns more
vs

Walking

294
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 4

Horseback riding burns more — about 415 kcal an hour versus 294 kcal for walking, for a 70 kg adult. That is 41% more, or 121 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 5.65 for horseback riding against 4 for walking.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

  1. Take the activity's MET value from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities — the measured ratio of its energy cost to sitting quietly.
  2. Convert MET to a rate using the ACSM relationship: multiply by 3.5, then by body mass in kilograms, then divide by 200. That gives kilocalories per minute.
  3. Multiply the rate by the number of minutes actually spent.
  4. Round to whole kilocalories. Nothing else is applied — no age factor, no sex factor, no proprietary adjustment, because the underlying data does not support one.
kcal/min = MET × 3.5 × mass(kg) ÷ 200
kcal     = kcal/min × minutes

Full data and method →

Side by side, by body weight and duration

Horseback riding against walking at MET 5.65 and MET 4, by body weight. JUL 2026
Body weightHorseback riding · 30 minWalking · 30 minHorseback riding · 1 hrWalking · 1 hr
50 kg 148105 297210
60 kg 178126 356252
70 kg 208147 415294
80 kg 237168 475336
90 kg 267189 534378
100 kg 297210 593420
110 kg 326231 653462
120 kg 356252 712504

Both columns use the same equation and the same reference data, so the comparison is like-for-like.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How to read this

A higher MET means a higher energy cost per minute — but the activity you will actually keep doing beats the one that scores better on paper. Horseback riding wins on rate; if walking is the one you enjoy, the extra 41% is easily recovered by doing 25 more minutes.

Both figures assume a 70 kg adult and steady effort for the full hour, which is a generous assumption for anything moderate. Realistic sessions include rest.

Questions

Does horseback riding or walking burn more calories?

Horseback riding burns more — about 415 kcal an hour versus 294 kcal for walking, for a 70 kg adult. That is 41% more, or 121 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 5.65 for horseback riding against 4 for walking.

Both numbers are models. Neither knows your gradient, your gear, or how hard you were actually trying.

MET values from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities. General information only — not medical, fitness or nutrition advice. Calorie figures are population estimates and vary between individuals.

See all 10 sites in this family, with what each one answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.