Part of the data ring
BurnLab
Head to head · same equation, both sides

Rope jumping vs Running

Which burns more calories, and by how much — from the same Compendium MET data.

Rope jumping

801
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 10.9
vs

Running

845
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 11.5
Burns more

Running burns more — about 845 kcal an hour versus 801 kcal for rope jumping, for a 70 kg adult. That is 6% more, or 44 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 10.9 for rope jumping against 11.5 for running.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

  1. Take the activity's MET value from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities — the measured ratio of its energy cost to sitting quietly.
  2. Convert MET to a rate using the ACSM relationship: multiply by 3.5, then by body mass in kilograms, then divide by 200. That gives kilocalories per minute.
  3. Multiply the rate by the number of minutes actually spent.
  4. Round to whole kilocalories. Nothing else is applied — no age factor, no sex factor, no proprietary adjustment, because the underlying data does not support one.
kcal/min = MET × 3.5 × mass(kg) ÷ 200
kcal     = kcal/min × minutes

Full data and method →

Side by side, by body weight and duration

Rope jumping against running at MET 10.9 and MET 11.5, by body weight. JUL 2026
Body weightRope jumping · 30 minRunning · 30 minRope jumping · 1 hrRunning · 1 hr
50 kg 286302 572604
60 kg 343362 687725
70 kg 401423 801845
80 kg 458483 916966
90 kg 515543 1,0301,087
100 kg 572604 1,1451,208
110 kg 629664 1,2591,328
120 kg 687725 1,3731,449

Both columns use the same equation and the same reference data, so the comparison is like-for-like.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How to read this

A higher MET means a higher energy cost per minute — but the activity you will actually keep doing beats the one that scores better on paper. Running wins on rate; if rope jumping is the one you enjoy, the extra 6% is easily recovered by doing 3 more minutes.

Both figures assume a 70 kg adult and steady effort for the full hour, which is a generous assumption for anything very vigorous. Realistic sessions include rest.

Questions

Does rope jumping or running burn more calories?

Running burns more — about 845 kcal an hour versus 801 kcal for rope jumping, for a 70 kg adult. That is 6% more, or 44 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 10.9 for rope jumping against 11.5 for running.

Both numbers are models. Neither knows your gradient, your gear, or how hard you were actually trying.

MET values from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities. General information only — not medical, fitness or nutrition advice. Calorie figures are population estimates and vary between individuals.

See all 10 sites in this family, with what each one answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.