Part of the data ring
BurnLab
Head to head · same equation, both sides

Running vs Bicycling

Which burns more calories, and by how much — from the same Compendium MET data.

Running

845
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 11.5
Burns more
vs

Bicycling

588
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 8

Running burns more — about 845 kcal an hour versus 588 kcal for bicycling, for a 70 kg adult. That is 44% more, or 257 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 11.5 for running against 8 for bicycling.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

  1. Take the activity's MET value from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities — the measured ratio of its energy cost to sitting quietly.
  2. Convert MET to a rate using the ACSM relationship: multiply by 3.5, then by body mass in kilograms, then divide by 200. That gives kilocalories per minute.
  3. Multiply the rate by the number of minutes actually spent.
  4. Round to whole kilocalories. Nothing else is applied — no age factor, no sex factor, no proprietary adjustment, because the underlying data does not support one.
kcal/min = MET × 3.5 × mass(kg) ÷ 200
kcal     = kcal/min × minutes

Full data and method →

Side by side, by body weight and duration

Running against bicycling at MET 11.5 and MET 8, by body weight. JUL 2026
Body weightRunning · 30 minBicycling · 30 minRunning · 1 hrBicycling · 1 hr
50 kg 302210 604420
60 kg 362252 725504
70 kg 423294 845588
80 kg 483336 966672
90 kg 543378 1,087756
100 kg 604420 1,208840
110 kg 664462 1,328924
120 kg 725504 1,4491,008

Both columns use the same equation and the same reference data, so the comparison is like-for-like.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How to read this

A higher MET means a higher energy cost per minute — but the activity you will actually keep doing beats the one that scores better on paper. Running wins on rate; if bicycling is the one you enjoy, the extra 44% is easily recovered by doing 26 more minutes.

Both figures assume a 70 kg adult and steady effort for the full hour, which is a generous assumption for anything very vigorous. Realistic sessions include rest.

Questions

Does running or bicycling burn more calories?

Running burns more — about 845 kcal an hour versus 588 kcal for bicycling, for a 70 kg adult. That is 44% more, or 257 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 11.5 for running against 8 for bicycling.

Both numbers are models. Neither knows your gradient, your gear, or how hard you were actually trying.

MET values from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities. General information only — not medical, fitness or nutrition advice. Calorie figures are population estimates and vary between individuals.

See all 10 sites in this family, with what each one answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.