Part of the data ring
BurnLab
Head to head · same equation, both sides

Swimming vs Running

Which burns more calories, and by how much — from the same Compendium MET data.

Swimming

588
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 8
vs

Running

845
kcal / hour at 70 kg · MET 11.5
Burns more

Running burns more — about 845 kcal an hour versus 588 kcal for swimming, for a 70 kg adult. That is 44% more, or 257 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 8 for swimming against 11.5 for running.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

  1. Take the activity's MET value from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities — the measured ratio of its energy cost to sitting quietly.
  2. Convert MET to a rate using the ACSM relationship: multiply by 3.5, then by body mass in kilograms, then divide by 200. That gives kilocalories per minute.
  3. Multiply the rate by the number of minutes actually spent.
  4. Round to whole kilocalories. Nothing else is applied — no age factor, no sex factor, no proprietary adjustment, because the underlying data does not support one.
kcal/min = MET × 3.5 × mass(kg) ÷ 200
kcal     = kcal/min × minutes

Full data and method →

Side by side, by body weight and duration

Swimming against running at MET 8 and MET 11.5, by body weight. JUL 2026
Body weightSwimming · 30 minRunning · 30 minSwimming · 1 hrRunning · 1 hr
50 kg 210302 420604
60 kg 252362 504725
70 kg 294423 588845
80 kg 336483 672966
90 kg 378543 7561,087
100 kg 420604 8401,208
110 kg 462664 9241,328
120 kg 504725 1,0081,449

Both columns use the same equation and the same reference data, so the comparison is like-for-like.

SOURCE·2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How to read this

A higher MET means a higher energy cost per minute — but the activity you will actually keep doing beats the one that scores better on paper. Running wins on rate; if swimming is the one you enjoy, the extra 44% is easily recovered by doing 26 more minutes.

Both figures assume a 70 kg adult and steady effort for the full hour, which is a generous assumption for anything very vigorous. Realistic sessions include rest.

Questions

Does swimming or running burn more calories?

Running burns more — about 845 kcal an hour versus 588 kcal for swimming, for a 70 kg adult. That is 44% more, or 257 extra calories per hour. The gap comes from their MET values: 8 for swimming against 11.5 for running.

Both numbers are models. Neither knows your gradient, your gear, or how hard you were actually trying.

MET values from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities. General information only — not medical, fitness or nutrition advice. Calorie figures are population estimates and vary between individuals.

See all 10 sites in this family, with what each one answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.